Rigged (1985) watch online (quality HD 720p)
We offer you to watch the movie Rigged (1985), which you can enjoy in the arms of a loved one. This film is in HD quality. Less words, more movies! Watch and enjoy!
General elections were set for 9 December and on 4 November Hoyte agreed to some long fought for demands by the opposition parties to abolish the overseas vote and cut back on proxy voting - two of the instruments used to rig elections since In making his "concessions", he boasted that he was cutting the ground from under the PPP which would no longer have any credible base to complain about "rigged" elections.
Impediments to free and fair elections But it was clear that the PNC had no intention of allowing free and fair elections. New features were introduced to facilitate vote rigging.
Voting by proxy and by the security forces was set aside for 3 December, six days before election day. Also, while voters were expected to vote on election day at places where they were registered, new regulations were introduced to allow voting at places other than where registration took place.
This opened the way to multiple voting, especially with the PNC having full control of the election machinery. Despite his "concessions" Hoyte stubbornly refused to agree for the counting of the votes at the polling places.
There was an obvious reason for this refusal. In the elections of and , the seizure of the ballots by the security forces and the secrecy of their "safekeeping" for many hours before the start of the official count had made it easy for the PNC to rig the election.
Thus, counting of ballots at the place of poll immediately after the end of polling could not be accommodated. This demand to ensure a fair count had been made since the rigged elections. Other opposition parties also made the same demand. The joint letter also questioned the appointment of Roy Hammond as Chief Elections Officer by the Government without the knowledge of the Elections Commission. Jagan, in a separate letter to Bollers, further questioned him on the selection and appointments of Hammond and other election officers without the Elections Commission having a supervisory role in the process.
With regard to the counting at the place of poll, Hoyte, first as Prime Minister and later as President, dismissed the proposal as a "red herring and an irrelevance" and "something that is logistically difficult and unacceptable.
Rigged (1985) - Release Info - IMDb
In another letter to Bollers on 13 November , Dr. Jagan requested that the ballot boxes be kept at all times from the close of polling to the end of counting in the view of the agents of the opposition parties. With this in mind, he asked for opposition polling agents to accompany the ballot boxes to the counting centres where the boxes must remain in their presence. Jagan also asked that these directives should be given to the Chief Elections Officer and all other electoral officers and publicised in the press and radio.
He saw his soldiers having a "geometric loyalty" to the PNC and his "comrade leader" Hoyte. Jagan subsequently wrote to the President on these very matters he raised with Bollers, but in a response through his political adviser, Hoyte, rather than dealing with the issues, accused the PPP leaders of planning violence during the election campaign period. This was obviously a PNC tactic to allow army intervention in the election and to sidetrack Dr.
In the end, the Elections Commission lukewarmly agreed to issue orders that polling agents could accompany ballot boxes. As a result, electoral authority was divided between the Government and the Commission with the Chief Elections Officer, Roy Hammond, actually taking instructions from the Minister of Home Affairs rather than the Elections Commission. There were deliberate actions by the Government to frustrate the opposition parties.
This made it impossible for opposition monitors to determine whether multiple voting by members of the security forces occurred.
Rigged (1985) - IMDb
Further, the lists of polling places for the security forces were given to opposition parties only at 3. As a result, it was impossible to assign polling agents particularly for the hinterland areas. Nevertheless, the PPP managed to appoint polling agents for only 10 out of the 25 polling places. A few months earlier, Jeffrey Thomas, the Minister of Home Affairs, had refused to allow opposition scrutineers to work alongside the official enumerators in the preparation of the national register.
He also ordered that the birth date of persons, especially between the ages of 18 to 25, must not be placed on the preliminary list of voters. The inclusion of birth dates was intended to safeguard against the padding of the voters lists with underage persons. The entire supplementary lists had been promised by Hammond to the PPP about a week before elections day, but they were never handed over.
Supplementary lists totalling 17, for nine of the ten regions were given to the PPP on December 8, one day before the election. But the supplementary list for Region 4 including Georgetown, the capital , totalling about 27,, was not supplied. Thus, opposition parties had no opportunity to check these names for errors. In response to protests, the Ministry of Home Affairs stated that lists only had to be displayed in such places as the Minister prescribed, and there was no obligation on anyone to send or give a copy to any political party!
Faced with mounting criticisms, the Minister of Home Affairs denied any Governmental interference. In a reply to a group of civic bodies, he rejected their suggestion that the Commission had no real power or authority to supervise the elections as provided by the Constitution. He informed them that "under the Constitution the Commission has overriding powers over all officials concerned in the administrative conduct of the elections and can issue any directions it considers necessary or expedient for the purpose of ensuring impartiality, fairness and compliance with the Constitution or other law.
The question of keeping the boxes in view up to and throughout the counting of the votes was widely regarded as the crucial test in the election as in previous ones. At the beginning of December, the Guyana Bar Association, for instance, wrote Bollers urging him to direct presiding officers to allow polling agents to accompany the boxes to the counting centres.
The Association also requested an urgent meeting with the Commission to discuss these fundamental electoral issues. Bollers refused to meet the lawyers, but he did give a directive that polling agents of the parties should be allowed to accompany the boxes. President Hoyte and the Minister of Home Affairs also gave such an assurance. But the opposition parties remained wary of these pronouncements since they knew the PNC could not win without tampering with the ballot boxes.
They felt that if the ruling party would not agree to a count at the place of poll, it was doubtful it would every allow opposition agents to accompany the ballot boxes to the counting centres. The Government stubbornly refused to demonstrate fair-mindedness and continued to set up obstacles.
A further example of this attitude was demonstrated when the PPP asked the Elections Commission to ensure that proper seals be placed over the slots of the ballot boxes and the holes of the padlocks, and for gummed and initialled paper to be wrapped around the boxes.
But the Commission bluntly refused to give such instructions to the presiding officers. The result was that ballot boxes, at the end of the voting, were not properly sealed. The campaign period Despite the deliberate handicaps placed in the path of the opposition, six opposition parties decided to contest against the PNC. Large crowds attended PPP and other opposition rallies but there were no reports of these in the state-owned media.
In contrast, the PNC rallies, to which the party used state-owned vehicles to ferry Government workers and their dependents from different parts of the country to make up the audience, received wide coverage in the same media.
A few days before the election, at the public request of the leading Christian Churches, the main opposition parties pledged themselves and their supporters to uphold the principles of non-violence during the elections. The PNC did not respond to the same public appeal. Refusal to allow international observers The election was held at a period when there was a continued decline in the overall economy and when the quality of life had further deteriorated.
So upset was the TUC, which was always under the control of the PNC, that it refused to endorse support for the party as it had done since The PNC realised that it was losing even its traditional support and so it decided very early not to allow international observers and to take full control of the electoral machinery as it did in , and Its planned strategy also included the ejection of polling agents and the stuffing of ballot boxes and the seizure by the military and tampering of the ballot boxes.
The PNC had been embarrassed by the findings of international observers in , and it wanted to continue with its propaganda that the opposition parties were poor losers. But the Government refused to grant visas to this team. The Caribbean Council of Churches was also not allowed to observe the election. Election day The electoral roll stood at ,, including 3, overseas voters stated as students on scholarships and Government workers stationed abroad. On election day the turnout was exceedingly high in rural areas of PPP strength and lower than normal in Georgetown and other areas where the PNC drew traditional support.
Problems started very early when many presiding officers, all of whom were PNC activists, began to eject opposition polling agents from the polling stations.
Armed thugs also assisted in throwing out opposition agents from many polling stations. In numerous cases, the presiding officers also refused to accept the official credentials of these polling agents who were thus refused entry to the polling stations to monitor the voting. Most of the ejections occurred in the rural opposition strongholds, but a new feature of this election was also the forceful ejection of opposition polling agents at polling places of traditional PNC strength, particularly in the capital Georgetown, and the bauxite mining towns, Linden and Kwakwani.
This became necessary as a result of a low turnout of voters in those areas; the restriction on overseas and proxy voting, and the abolition of postal voting; and the difficulty of tampering with ballot boxes in Georgetown because of the concentration of regional and international journalists, a situation which forced the armed forces to adopt a low profile in the capital.
On the other hand, the armed forces were very visible and intimidating elsewhere in man handling voters and eventually seizing control of the ballot boxes when the polls closed. The ejection of the polling agents more than compensated for the restricted overseas and proxy voting and the abolished postal voting. The PNC control of the electoral machinery, including election personnel, facilitated the ruling party in stuffing ballot boxes with votes for dead, emigrated, under age and non-existent persons on the one hand, and in disenfranchising non supporters on the other.
It was against this background, including the ejection of opposition polling agents, that PNC gun-wielding thugs unleashed a violent attack on British journalist Anthony Jenkins and Dr. Jagan at Haslington, East Coast Demerara. Jagan had gone there to investigate why a polling agent had been ejected from the polling place and why a PPP supporter had been refused the right to vote. Immediately, the polling officer went to the window and shouted to some people outside that Dr.
Jagan was there to cause disturbance. A group of armed men then rushed into the building, attacked Dr. Jagan, and pushed him down the stairs. The British journalist who was standing on the roadside was then set upon and severely beaten by the thugs. There was one policeman on duty but he did nothing to stop these assaults. Further violations The elections displayed the same patterns of behaviour as in and The army was out again in full battle gear, particularly in the rural areas where the PPP had massive support.
PNC activists and thugs had unrestricted access to polling stations in urban areas and at some places in the countryside as well. Countless violations, which were ignored by elections officials and the police, occurred in and around the polling stations. These violations ranged from PNC activists entering polling stations and taking ballot books from the officials to be filled in by them outside the polling stations and then stuffed into the ballot boxes, to open and repeated multiple voting by PNC supporters.
Objections of opposition agents were studiously ignored by the presiding officers. And at the end of the polling, as occurred in previous PNC-controlled elections, the boxes were whisked away by fully armed GDF soldiers and supposedly taken to the counting centres where they "vanished" for many hours only to reappear full with rigged ballots in favour of the PNC. Actually, the elections were in many ways even worse than those of and As the Government itself admitted, there was no threat, real or pretended, to their peaceful progress.
As the Ministry of Information "analysis" of the elections which was distributed to Embassies and High Commissions in Guyana and to institutions abroad, but which was not otherwise distributed in Guyana, stated: Opposition polling agents were generally not allowed to perform their duties and to accompany the ballot boxes.
Many of them had already been physically ejected from the polling places. Some of them had their lives threatened by armed thugs in the very presence of the presiding officers and the police who did absolutely nothing to intervene. Actually, the presiding officers and police seized the written notes of many of the opposition polling agents. And at the close of the poll, some of these agents were physically assaulted by the military.
Because of the forceful ejection of many opposition polling agents from polling stations, the PPP announced at 5.